} 新任教員 – Page 15 – UTokyo FD
Categories
Information

[10th UTokyo FFP] Certificate Award Ceremony Conducted

The 10th Certificate Award Ceremony of “The University of Tokyo Future Faculty Program (UTokyo FFP)” was held in Fukutake Learning Studio, Fukutake hall, on Tuesday, February 20th, 2018.
Forty-five participants completed the 10th program, each receiving a certificate. They had a congratulatory address from Prof. Osamu Sudo, Director of the Center for Research and Development of Higher Education, The University of Tokyo.
Alumni also appeared as guest speakers and explained their various activities after the program’s completion and alumni network.

UTokyo FFP has produced a total of 476 people who completed the program from every graduate school at The University of Tokyo, marking the 10th semester and fifth anniversary.
Our next program (the 11th UTokyo FFP) is scheduled to start in April 2018. The application form will be available on the following URL in early March.

→ https://dev2.utokyofd.com/en/ffp/apply/

Also, we accept “Pre-application” preceding the application. If you are interested, please register from the “Pre-application form” on the above URL.

Categories
Event Information

[Upcoming] The 4th Workshop on the Creation of a Teaching Portfolio Chart

The 4th Workshop on the Creation of a Teaching Portfolio Chart (TP Chart) is to be held on campus. For those who would like to reflect on your teaching activities with other participants, please join us. For the details of the TP Chart, please refer to the end of this post.

Date/Time: Saturday, March 3rd, 2018

13:00–15:30 1 Creation of a TP Chart
15:30–15:45 Break
15:45–16:45 2 Reexamination of the philosophy and methodology (Refine your TP Chart.)
16:45–17:00 3 How to hold a workshop on the creation of a TP Chart
17:00–18:00 4 Networking session (Interact with other participants freely.)

Venue: 92B, Faculty of Engineering Building 2, Hongo Campus, The University of Tokyo
http://www.u-tokyo.ac.jp/campusmap/cam01_04_03_j.html
Target: Instructors (elementary school, junior high school, senior high school, or university)
Capacity: 60 people (accepted in the order of application)
Instructors: Kayoko Kurita  (Center for Research and Development of Higher Education) and Lui Yoshida (College of Arts and Sciences) Fee: Free of charge
Application Deadline: March 1st, 11:59 PM (We may close the application before the deadline if the number of applicants reaches the quota.)
Goals: To reflect on teaching activities through the creation of a TP Chart.
To examine the significance and potential of creating a TP chart through the creation.

Application Form: Please apply from here.

Goals: To reflect on teaching activities through the creation of a TP Chart.
To examine the significance and potential of creating a TP chart through the creation.

 

[Notes]
*We have already held training programs for creating a TP Chart in many parts of the country, but we are planning to assess the effects of the programs once again. For the participants, we would like to ask for their cooperation to respond to our questionnaires.
*Sixty people will be accepted in the order of application.
*”4 Networking session” is a free session. Please bring drinks and snacks on your own.

[For your information]
“Interactive Teaching” Forum: Part 1 “Revisiting How to Create a Syllabus” is to be held on the following day of the workshop. Creating a syllabus equals designing a course. Why not reconsider a syllabus as not just paperwork but a tool to realize better learning? Anyone can join the forum. We look forward to your application. For more details, please refer to the following website.

【開催】「インタラクティブ・ティーチング」フォーラム 第1回「あらためて、シラバス」

 

[Description of the workshop on the creation of a TP Chart]
A Teaching Portfolio refers to “A carefully selected reflective document about teaching supported by various evidence.”

Its basic structure is as follows:
-Teaching responsibility (What you are doing)
-Philosophy (Why you are doing)
-Methodology (How you are doing)
-Outcome (How it came out)
-Goals (What you will do next)

It is a process to specify the “core” of your teaching through “reflection” and “dialogue.”

A Teaching Portfolio is a document consisting of 8–10 pages of body and evidence that supports the body. It has become common to use it as material to evaluate the quality of teaching activities from multiple angles in European and American countries. Essentially, it takes about three days to create a Teaching Portfolio, but this time, participants will create a “Teaching Portfolio Chart (TP Chart),” a simple version of a TP. A TP Chart is a single worksheet, which enables you to reflect on your teaching activities step by step just like a Teaching Portfolio. There are various training programs for instructors these days, but what is becoming important is the “mindset” toward education, not “techniques.” A TP Chart can be a powerful tool for making such an approach. We would like more people to experience creating a TP Chart.

If you are interested in joining the workshop, please apply from here so that we can prepare the material for the event. We look forward to your application.

Categories
Information

[10th UTokyo FFP] DAY 8: Creation of a SAP Chart

The new year has started, and DAY 8 of the 10th UTokyo FFP was held on January 5th and 11th.

Participants created their SAP Charts on DAY 8. A SAP Chart is for reflecting on past activities, examining the value and significance of teaching and research, and thinking about future prospects. We believe that it is meaningful for the participants to create a chart while they are graduate students. The following is the explanation of a SAP Chart (repost from the previous article):

SAP stands for “Structured Academic Portfolio” (Yoshida & Kurita, 2016a). Essentially, an academic portfolio is “a reflective, evidence-based collection of materials that documents teaching, research, and service performance” (Seldin & Miller, 2009). The feature of a SAP is that “the description is structured with specific steps and points.” A SAP Chart (Yoshida & Kurita, 2016b) is positioned as a preparatory assignment for creating a SAP, but since it enables the author to reflect on his/her entire activities in a short time (though roughly) and makes it easier to overview the description, it can also be used as a single item. It is a suitable tool for graduate students to envision their career paths and gives them an opportunity to connect what they learned in the UTokyo FFP and their own teaching philosophy. This is why the creation of a SAP Chart is incorporated into the materials in the final session of the program.

Participants were given three and a half hours to create their SAP Charts. They shared their works in pairs at any time and deepened their reflection by explaining their charts and answering questions cast by their partners. They first seemed to be “awkward” in explaining their teaching philosophy and research values to another person, but they gradually got used to it and had a lively discussion with their partners; they could not stop talking even when we announced the closing of the sharing session.

We are deeply relieved that the UTokyo FFP completed the entire classes, marking the 10th semester. Five years have passed since the launch of the UTokyo FFP, and its course materials have been highly developed compared to the initial year. Although we finally made it to run the program smoothly, we find points to be improved in every session. As an organizing staff member, I hope the program keeps developing.

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all the participants of the 10th UTokyo FFP.

 

 

  • ・Seldin, P., & Miller, J. E. (2009). The academic portfolio: a practical guide to documenting teaching, research, and service (Vol. 132). John Wiley & Sons.
  • ・Yoshida, L., & Kurita, K. (2016a). Kōzōka academic portfolio sakusei no hyōka [Evaluation of the creation of a Structured Academic Portfolio]. The 22nd Kyoto University Conference on Higher Education, 238-239, 2016.3.17-18, Kyoto University
  • ・Yoshida, L., & Kurita, K. (2016b). Evaluation of Structured Academic Portfolio Chart and Workshop for Reflection on Academic Work. Procedia Computer Science, 96, 1454-1462.
Categories
Event Information

[10th UTokyo FFP] DAY 5 Exercise in Giving Feedback on Lectures & Summary (Experiencing the Strategy of “Poster Tour”)

DAY 5 sessions were held on November 30th and December 1st. This time, the topics were “Exercise in Giving Feedback on Lectures” and “Summary.”

Exercise in Giving Feedback on Lectures

Every UTokyo FFP participant conducted a 6-min lecture for microteaching, which did not end with just one trial. They conducted lectures according to the following schedule:

Examination of a lecture for microteaching (to find the viewpoints for designing “a good lecture for microteaching” and to practice giving feedback) (DAY 5)
Conducting a lecture for microteaching (1st trial) in small groups of 5–6 & thorough peer-reviewing (DAY 6)
Conducting a lecture for microteaching (2nd trial) (in groups of 12–13) (DAY 7)

This time, we went through the first step of the above three. Two participants with different research fields voluntarily conducted or were appointed to conduct lectures for microteaching, and the whole participants examined those lectures. This activity was intended to help the participants enhance the quality of their lectures for microteaching by sharing feedback from multiple perspectives.

Prior to the examination of the lectures for microteaching, participants were informed about the value of conducting lectures for microteaching (i.e., it is a precious opportunity), ground rules (i.e., to keep in mind the 3Ks: “Be respectful (敬意 Keii) to others,” “Speak without reserve (忌憚なく Kitan naku),” and “Be constructive (建設的 Kensetsuteki).”), and that they should find the viewpoints for designing their own lectures through the activity.

・A lecture for microteaching (6 min)
・Participants fill in the feedback sheets while the lecturer receives feedback from the instructor. (3 min)
・Group discussions on what was good about the lecture and what points needed improvement (12 min)
・Sharing and discussing the ideas in the whole classroom (12 min) (It actually took more than 12 minutes.)

Following the two lectures for microteaching, participants discussed and shared how to generalize the points that were good or that needed improvement they had found in those lectures. The generalization process was intended to help the participants acquire viewpoints for designing their lectures for microteaching and their regular classes in the future.

Summary (using “Poster Tour”)

Participants reviewed what they had learned so far, using a strategy called “Poster Tour.” The goals of this activity were not just to review the materials but also to experience the “Poster Tour,” one of the active learning strategies.

For more details on the “Poster Tour,” please click the following link: “Interactive Teaching” WEEK 2: Poster Tour

The assignment for reflection included the examination of the advantages and disadvantages of the strategy compared with the “Gallery Walk,” which was conducted in the previous session.

Active learning strategies seem difficult to be applied to practices just from the knowledge acquired through lectures. Experiencing such strategies by themselves allow learners to realize their effects and limits. It does not necessarily assure that you will “be able to use the strategies,” but at least it helps you imagine how to use them based on your own experience.

(Kurita)

Categories
Event Information

The University of Tokyo Medical Education Basic Course (Part 6): “Active Learning”

We are sorry for the short notice. We are pleased to cooperate with the following course today.

Date/Time: November 28th (Tue), 2017, 18:00–19:30

Venue: Conference Room 333, 3F, Medical Library, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo

http://www.ircme.m.u-tokyo.ac.jp/archives/5865

Categories
Information

【Event report】“Class Management: How to Solve Problems in Teaching”

<About>Thursday, November 2nd, 2017

Professional and Global Educators’ Community (PAGE) organized a workshop “Class Management: How to Solve Problems in Teaching.” In addition to research skills, faculty members are now required to have skills in education. Along with the increase of university enrollment rate and globalization, there is a growing demand for skills in delivering classes in English for students with various cultural backgrounds. In response to such demand, we invited Associate Professor Jan Sølberg from the University of Copenhagen, an expert in teacher development, as an instructor and organized a workshop to discuss how to manage classes in English based on the present situation of higher education in Europe.

It was held at the Ito International Research Center, Hongo Campus. A total of 26 participants consisted of graduate students, postdocs, and young researchers at the University of Tokyo. It was a three-hour-long workshop conducted in English, but we welcomed a lot of participants coming from diverse academic fields.

The instructor started the workshop by giving a lecture on the present situation regarding the globalization of higher education in Europe. A lot of participants seemed to be surprised at the fact that 35% of faculty members in science and 46% graduate students of master’s programs in science at the University of Copenhagen came from overseas. He then presented three cases that illustrated the problems faculty members were likely to encounter when teaching in English: how to conduct and evaluate examinations in English, how to organize group works in English, and how to deal with students’ needs who vary in cultural background and views in education. These are all serious issues that faculty members are required to solve. The participants listened attentively to the lecture.

Following the lecture was an activity with groups of four to five.
The participants engaged in a group work as shown below:

1. They listed up three important problems involved in EMI (English as a Medium of Instruction) and wrote them on large-sized Post-it Notes.

2. Each group’s Post-it Notes were handed on to the next one. The participants chose one of the three problems written on the Notes and discussed an effective solution to it in groups. They wrote the solution on a different Post-it Note and posted it on the wall together with the Note they chose.

3. The participants looked through the problems and solutions posted on the wall and exchanged ideas with other groups.
All the groups were actively engaged in the assignment and discussion.

Thanks to the diversity of their research fields, the participants seemed to be exchanging ideas from a wide variety of perspectives. Some of them actively moved around the venue to ask questions to other groups, and others discussed with the instructor.

The instructor gave a wrap-up lecture after the group work. He gave specific tips such as the points of preparing for classes conducted in English, how to communicate with lone-wolf students, and the points you should consider when presenting assignments to students.

The discussion never stopped throughout the three-hour-long workshop.
We received positive feedback from the participants as follows:
“It was a very fulfilling program, well-structured to enable active participation.”
“It was a good opportunity to discuss education with people from other fields.”
“It’s nice to have a lot of communication with people from different fields.”

PAGE will continue to hold workshops on the improvement of academic communication skills in English. We sincerely look forward to your participation.

Click here for a free online program provided by the PAGE project: English Academia.↓
https://utokyo-ea.com

Click here for more details of the PAGE project. ↓
https://www.he.u-tokyo.ac.jp/activities/page/

Categories
Information

【Event report】“Improve your presentations in English! Remedies to your troubles”

<About>Saturday, September 30th & Sunday, October 1st, 2017

Professional and Global Educators’ Community (PAGE) organized a workshop “Improve your presentations in English! Remedies to your troubles.” We planned the event in response to the recent demand of outputting research in English along with the globalization of research environment. The purpose of the workshop was to let the participants improve their skills in making academic presentations in English.

It was held at the Faculty of Engineering Building 2, Hongo Campus. A total of 25 participants consisted of graduate students and postdocs at the University of Tokyo. They came from diverse academic fields such as the Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, the Graduate School of Economics, the School of Science, the Graduate School of Medicine, and the School of Engineering. In addition to those who spoke English as their first language, professional English interpreters and bilinguals with a long experience of studying overseas served as instructors. The workshop was conducted in small groups.

The participants were divided into groups of two to five, and each of them made a presentation on their research and received feedback from the instructor and the other participants. The presentations covered a wide variety of themes of science (such as “carbohydrate metabolism” and “olfactory map”) and humanities (such as “gender division” and “rural development”). All the presentations were filmed and recorded with iPads and IC recorders, and the data were provided to the presenters who needed them.

Subsequently, the English instructors made sample presentations. As they say, “Seeing is believing.” The participants seemed to have learned a lot from the instructors’ performance with visually organized slides, effective gestures that attracted the eyes of the audience, and logically structured content without unnecessary things.

The participants then individually worked on improving their presentation materials and methods. They were able to consult the instructors at any time and also had an active discussion with other participants.

Finally, they gave a second try on making presentations and received feedback in groups. Some participants used a projector and a massive screen as if they were making presentations at a real academic conference. Through a half-day exercise, all the groups were able to improve their presentations from the first ones. The instructors commented on the presentations, and all the participants shared the points they should further improve.

We received positive feedback from the participants after the workshop as follows:
“With an opportunity to make a presentation and receive thorough feedback in such a small group, I sincerely feel that I’ve made a progress in just a half day.”
“It was valuable to receive thorough feedback from the instructor. Thanks to it, I gained a little confidence. The workshop was a precious time for me.”
“By immersing myself in an environment where I had to make a presentation without any script, I came to realize surprisingly that I was able to make it. I gained self-confidence.”

PAGE will continue to hold workshops on the improvement of academic communication skills in English. We sincerely look forward to your participation.


Click here for a free online program provided by the PAGE project: English Academia.↓
https://utokyo-ea.com

Click here for more details of the PAGE project. ↓
https://www.he.u-tokyo.ac.jp/activities/page/

Categories
Information

[10th UTokyo FFP] DAY 2 Class Design

DAY 2 sessions for the 10th UTokyo FFP were held on October 19th and 20th. The main topics were as follows:

  • ・Instructional design and the ADDIE model
  • ・Class design (How to design a class of 90 or 105 minutes)
  • ・Active learning strategies (Asking questions, Think-Pair-Share, and Peer Instruction)
  • ・Effects and limits of active learning
  • ・Motivation (Expectancy-value theory and environment)
  • ・Exercise in class design
We had a lot of topics to cover in a single session.
Essentially, each of them needs plenty of time to learn.
I showed the participants the following paper when explaining the effects of active learning:

Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. science, 332(6031), 862-864.

According to the paper, the scores of the examination after the class were overwhelmingly higher for the students who took an interactive class conducted by an inexperienced postdoc than for those who took a one-way lecture conducted by an expert instructor with high ratings on his/her classes. The “interactive” here means that the Peer Instruction method was used.

Peer Instruction is a method developed by Dr. Eric Mazur at Harvard University. The instructor prepares a multiple-choice question that requires reflection, and prepared students tackle the question and have a debate with neighboring students on the choices they made. The debate is for sharing the reasons why they chose a certain answer and convincing others. Please refer to the following link for more details.

https://dev2.utokyofd.com/en/it/summary/#section02

The advantage of Peer Instruction is that students can remember what they learned regardless of whether they chose the right or wrong answer by getting involved in a discussion on the question. Even if they realized that they were wrong, they would never forget the concept they are supposed to learn with that question. Therefore, the important thing is to provide the students with an environment in which they can reveal their thoughts without hesitation even if they may be wrong. Otherwise, saying something wrong may equal being embarrassed, which makes them refrain from speaking.

Making the environment secure enough to let the participants “listen to others, give an opinion, and have a discussion” is important not only for Peer Instruction but also for group activities.

Categories
Information

[Report] The 3rd Frendship Luncheon

Friendship Luncheon was held at Faculty of Law & Letters Bldg. 2 on October 16th.
There were 11 participants including those without pre-registration.

Just like the past Luncheons, participants were divided into groups of about four and exchanged questions and others related to student life in Japan.
Every group consisted of both overseas students and Japanese. They seemed to be having a lively conversation in a friendly atmosphere over the above topic and others.

We are planning to continue holding this Luncheon event to help overseas and Japanese students, who have few opportunities to communicate in their daily lives, interact with each other.

The following is the overview of the next event (The 4th Luncheon). Please feel free to join us.
==
・Date/Time (The 4th Luncheon): December 11th, 2017, 12:10–13:00

・Venue: 2201, 2F, Faculty of Law & Letters Bldg. 2

・Intended for: UTokyo members only with any position: Undergraduates, Graduates, or Faculty/Staff

・Language: Japanese

・Please bring your lunch and drink.

Registration Form